Friday, March 19, 2010

Jean Plaidy non-fiction

Jean Plaidy wrote several non-fiction books on the Spanish Inquisition and I found that A Triptych of Poisoners is also non-fiction. I just received a 1971 Hale edition of the book and after perusing it for a while and looking it up online I finally came to the conclusion that it's not fiction. It's so funny that it's hard to tell the difference! The cover looks like her other Hale covers and the description on the book jacket does not specify that the book is not fiction, but there are illustrations and photos. Perhaps the biggest clue is that there is no dialog. Anyway, here is the book description.


What makes men and women commit murder? Is it environment and upbringing? Or is it some characteristic unaffected by surroundings and contacts? In this triptych, the author has sought to answer these questions by an analysis of the lives of three notorious poisoners, each guilty of more than one murder, and living in different periods of time.

First is Cesare Borgia, most notorious of all poisoners, who among his many crimes was suspected of the murder of his brother, and was the self-confessed murderer of his brother-in-law. Sadistic and sinister, even for fifteenth-century Italy, his brief life was one of the most evil ever lived. Was he to blame for his sins? Or does the blame lie with an indulgent parent and a barbaric age?

Second is Marie d'Aubray, Marquise de Brinvillers--beautiful, reckless poisoner of seventeenth-century Paris. Marie and her lover Sainte-Croix sought to discover the lost secrets of the Borgias, that she might remove those who stood between her and her family fortune. Visiting the Paris hospital as a Sister of Mercy, experimentally trying out her concoctions on the patients, Marie was indifferent to the sufferings of others. Was she to blame?

Last comes Edward Pritchard, the Glasgow doctor. Living mid-way through the Victorian era, the doctor was as knowledgeable in the art of poisoning as his predecessors and had no compunction in removing any who stood in his way.

In these studies Jean Plaidy discloses the similarity in all three and asks: Whose is the guilt?


  1. This is the most amazing thing ever! (but, this should not surprise me since I consider even her HF as non-fiction). Thanks Arleigh- I will have to look for this- an absolute must for my collection!

  2. I own and have read quite a few of J.P's books (as you know) but did not know about the nonfiction. Interesting.

  3. I had no idea that she wrote any non-fiction. And I have to agree with Lucy, her fiction is pretty close to non-fiction, so I guess it sort of makes sense. Thanks for the info.

  4. The writing style is so similar, it is very hard to see a difference. Now I really want to order her books on the Inquisition... it's so neat getting her perspective on issues such as these.

  5. I knew she'd written non-fic but this wasn't one that I readily recognized. Thanks--it sounds interesting!

  6. Oh My! I. Want. It. Badly.

    Off to find me a copy! Thanks for this post Arleigh.